Map Of Union And Confederate States – The election should not be confusing At , we want to empower people with the context to make sense of the deluge of electoral news. Help keep this work free for everyone. x
April 1865 was an important month in American history. On April 9, the Confederate Army under Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union forces of Ulysses S. Grant, effectively ending the Civil War. Then, on April 14 – 150 years ago today – victorious President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. The Civil War is often called the Second American Revolution. It ended the scourge of slavery while strengthening the relative economic power of the North over the South. Here are 37 maps that explain the origins of the war, why the North won, and how the war changed the United States of America.
Map Of Union And Confederate States
If you don’t want to read much about the Civil War, this animation provides a good quick recap of how the battles unfolded. The Confederate forces fared very well in 1861 and 1862, with territory moving back and forth especially in the slave border states of Kentucky and Missouri. But in 1863 the Union began to gain substantial territory along the Mississippi River, in Tennessee, and along strategically important parts of the Atlantic coast. The Confederacy had essentially no way to recover militarily, but its land mass was still vast, and continuing the war until the South was completely overrun was a costly and difficult proposition. The big question of the war was really whether the Union would pay the price of victory or seek a negotiated settlement. The issue was decided on the battlefield and at the ballot box, with William Sherman’s capture of Atlanta in September 1864 providing a tremendous boost to Lincoln’s re-election, which in turn essentially sealed the victory of the Union.
Atlas To Accompany The Official Records Of The Union And Confederate Armies, In Two Volumes
Northern states enjoyed a growing majority in the House of Representatives in the decades leading up to the Civil War. But in the Senate, each state gets two votes, regardless of population. And from 1800 to 1850, there were always at least as many slave states as free, giving southern states an effective veto over anti-slavery legislation. But the westward expansion of the United States threatened to tip the balance, as many of the states that aspired to join the Union were ill-suited to slave plantation agriculture. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily preserved this balance by allowing Missouri as a slave state. But an attempt to resume this conflict in 1850 was less successful. In the 1850s, the fight to allow slavery in the new states – especially in Kansas – began to tear the nation apart.
By the end of the Civil War, the abolition of slavery was quite a popular position in the North. But a few decades earlier it was considered a much more radical position. In 1840, the new Liberty Party approved Kentucky lawyer James Barney as president; received less than 7,000 votes. This map shows the results of Birney’s second presidential run in 1844. He received 62,000 votes, or about 2 percent of the vote. Even in abolitionist strongholds like Massachusetts and New Hampshire, Birney received only about 8 percent of the vote. But the support for the abolitionist ideas was in the North in the next two decades.
It is impossible to draw an accurate map of “the” subway because it was not a literal railroad. Rather, it was a network of anti-slavery organizations that helped escaped slaves achieve safety and freedom, both in the northern states and in Canada. But this map shows some of the most popular ways slaves escaped to freedom: either down the Mississippi River or along the Northeast Corridor through Washington, DC, Philadelphia and New York. Part of the Compromise of 1850 was a new Fugitive Slave Law that required government officials in northern states to help capture runaway slaves and return them to their owners. Northern whites in abolitionist strongholds like Boston sometimes organized mobs to defy the law, creating tensions between the North and the South.
In the 1850s, Kansas was about to be incorporated as a new state, sparking a dispute over whether it would be a slave state like neighboring Missouri or a free state. In the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, Congress ruled that this issue would be decided by (white) voters in the sparsely populated area. Abolitionists began moving into Kansas in hopes of creating an anti-slavery majority. Pro-slavery residents of Missouri crossed the border in 1855 to illegally vote for a pro-slavery legislature. This fraud and bloodshed radicalized Northern voters and made them more willing to support aggressive measures to stop the spread of slavery, even if it angered the South.
Maps That Explain The American Civil War
Abolitionist radical John Brown, a veteran of Kansas violence, devised a plan in 1859 to attack a federal arsenal in Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. Brown’s goal was to arm the slaves on nearby plantations and encourage them to spread across the country and free and arm more slaves. This plan was a total failure. Few nearby slaves knew that the raid had taken place, and none of them were willing to risk their lives by taking up arms against their masters. When Brown allowed a passing train to pass, the alarm went off. Soon Brown was surrounded by local militias and federal troops. After his capture, Brown realized his role as a martyr and made an eloquent anti-slavery speech after being convicted of treason and murder. Some abolitionists saw Brown as a hero. But Southerners were naturally outraged by Brown’s actions, which increased the tension between the North and the South.
Yes, the Civil War was about slavery. 7) The Industrial Revolution sparked a cotton boom in the South
The early 1800s was a time of rapid advances in weaving technology. And as the textile industry boomed in Great Britain and New England, the demand for cotton grew. This stimulated the economy of the American South, whose warm and humid climate and fertile soils are suitable for the production of cotton. This map shows how the South responded in the four decades leading up to the Civil War. Cotton production expanded and intensified from Texas to North Carolina and from Tennessee to Florida. In 1860, cotton accounted for 60 percent of American exports, and almost all of it came from the South.
It is no coincidence that this pair of cards looks so similar to the cotton cards above. Huge cotton plantations in the South relied heavily on slaves for the menial work of planting and picking cotton – so the growing demand for cotton meant a growing demand for slaves. Meanwhile, things went in the opposite direction in the North, where small farmers and industrialization limited the value of slave labor. Thus, the United States became increasingly divided between a slave South and a free North.
Economic Warfare: The Union Blockade In The Civil War
Sometimes you hear arguments that the Civil War wasn’t really about slavery, but about other issues like states’ rights or excessive federal power. But when you look at which states — and which parts of states — voted for secession, it becomes hard to deny that slavery was a major factor. In Tennessee, for example, support for secession was stronger in the West, where slave ownership was more widespread. The mountain people of East Tennessee, where slave ownership was rare, were less enthusiastic about the idea. Similarly, slavery was relatively rare in northern Alabama, and voters voted against secession. In Virginia, slavery was rare in the mountain west, which resisted secession and became the separate state of West Virginia.
Every president elected before 1860 had at least some support in the North and South. But by 1860, the gulf between North and South had become so great that no candidate or party could bridge it. The national parties that have dominated American politics for decades have split along dividing lines. The northern half of the Democratic Party named one candidate, while southern Democrats named another. In the north, remnants of the disbanded Whig party joined with abolitionists to form the Republican Party, while southern Whigs joined with nativists to form the Constitutional Union Party. The result was effectively two different presidential elections. In the North, Republican Abraham Lincoln (red) defeated Democrat Stephen Douglas (blue). In the South, Southern Democrat John Breckinridge (green) defeated Constitutional Unionist John Bell (orange).
Obviously, according to the Constitution, the United States can only have one president. This chart illustrates why the winner in the northern states—Lincoln—became president even though he received few votes in the slave states. Today Florida, Texas and California are the three largest states in the union, but in 1860 they were so sparsely populated that they played little political role. Instead, the three largest states were all in the north: New York, Pennsylvania and Ohio. Together, they represent more than a quarter of the nation’s electoral vote. Add in the staunchly Republican Northeast and the fast-growing Midwest, and Lincoln ended up with 180 votes in the electoral college.
Union and confederate states list, civil war map union and confederate states, map of the confederate and union states, union vs confederate states map, union vs confederate states, confederate union states, confederate and union states, list of union states and confederate states, union and confederate states map, map of the united states union and confederate, union confederate states map, map of union states and confederate states
